Once the duty of care is established, the plaintiff
would need a preponderance of evidence to
prove that
(1) the information provided was
materially deficient,
(2) the deficient information was a
proximate cause of injury suffered,
(3) the recipient reasonably relied on the
information provided,
(4) the information deficiency was due to
failure to exercise reasonable care,
and
(5) the pharmacist knew or should have
known that the safety or health of
another may have depended on the
accuracy of the information provided.