where the plaintiffs alleged that the pharmacist’s failure to properly warn of the known dangers of desipramine was the proximate cause of the patient’s death, the court held that pharmacists have a duty beyond accurately filling a prescription “based on known contraindications, which would alert a reasonably prudent pharmacist to a potential problem.” 27 However, the court did not find for the plaintiff opining that pharmacist do not have knowledge that desipramine may cause hypereosinophilic syndrome.